Thursday, October 6, 2011

The Shepherd and the Shulamite

The Shulamite Bride
Dear Saints,


Thanks to Paula for sending this! It is a well written piece about the Shulamite woman in Song of Solomon, whom I believe represents the bride of Christ. I pray you will glean some "nuggets of truth" from this and continue in your own yielding to the sanctification process.
Enjoy!
Sarah

THE MYSTERY OF THE CHURCH:
“The Shepherd and the Shulamite”
By Keith Malcomson

The Song of Solomon is certainly my favourite book of the Old Testament. From a child I have been most aware that it opened up a deep revelation concerning intimate fellowship with the person of Jesus Christ.  


Just as the Book of Ruth was read each year at the Feast of Pentecost by Israel, the Book of Solomon was read by them at Passover. Its theme and message is redeeming love. It speaks of the Bride and the Blood.  


It starts with the words “Song of Songs” (Song 1:1). Solomon wrote 1005 songs and 3000 proverbs (I Kgs.4:32), yet this is the greatest song he ever wrote. It is thee song or the greatest song of all. Moses and David were also song writers but this is indeed the greatest.  


Solomon 


Most commentators and Bible teachers, both ancient and modern, teach that Solomon in this song is a type of Christ and that the Shulamite is a type of the Church. But this is only partially correct. In this song Solomon is not a type of Jesus Christ.  


During the events and writing of this song we read in Song 6:8 that Solomon had 60 Queens, 80 concubines and virgins without number. For Solomon to pursue the Shulamite and add her to his already large harem which would yet grow in size to 1000 is hardly a story about the exclusive love of Jesus Christ.  


In earlier days Solomon had experienced personal visitations of God (I Kgs.11:9). His name means peace and at birth he was given the name Jedidiah by God which means whom the Lord has sworn to love.  


He was one who knew the real Gospel of grace, who had an experience of the true God and who walked in the truth of God but through love of many foreign women his heart was turned from the true God unto other god’s.  


Solomon is a picture in this song of many loves and of foreign beliefs mixed with the true gospel. He is a picture of the true and false mixed and merged within the church. He reveals to us a gospel and church which is a mixture of the real with utter apostasy.  


The Shulamite  


Solomon had many women. Why would he write about the Shulamite? He wrote about her because she was the one who got away. He had all the wealth, all the woman and all the wisdom he could desire but he wanted this little woman as well. But she resisted all his offers and eventually got away.  


Some commentators have thought that she was Pharaoh’s daughter or the Queen of Sheba. But again this cannot be so. She was not rich, powerful or foreign. We are told that she tended sheep and tended to vineyards and as a result she was heavily sunburnt (Song 1:6). Her mother was a widow and she had brothers.  


She is always associated in the song with villages, fields, gardens, sheepfolds and mountains; not palaces, princes and power. Her name comes from Shulem or Shunem a small village near Nazareth (Song 6:13)  




The Shepherd  


Jesus Christ our Shepherd


Who then is her lover in the song? He is called the Shepherd. He may well have even come from Nazareth! He is revealed in Song 1:7 as her lover and as a shepherd, “Tell me, O thou whom my soul loveth, where thou feedest, where thou makest thy flock to rest at noon: for why should I be as one that turneth aside by the flocks of thy companions?”  


Jesus Christ is the “shepherd of the sheep” (Jn.10:2) “the good shepherd” (11) “the great shepherd” (Heb.13:12) and “the chief Shepherd” (I Pet.5:4). The predominate mark of the Shepherd is His sacrificial love. This was the one whom the Shulamite loved and who the Church now loves.  


All through this song the Shepherd refers to the Shulamite as “My love, my fair one” and as the “fairest among women” (Song 1:15; 2:10, 13; 4:1, 7, 10; 5:9; 6:1, 10). There was none to compare with her; she was His only true love. This is another proof that he cannot have been Solomon. This was an exclusive love set upon one person only and shared with none other.  


Her Beloved goes on to say “Thou hast ravished my heart, my sister, my spouse; thou hast ravished my heart with one of thine eyes...”  (Song 4:9) and “Turn away thine eyes from me, for they have overcome me:” (Song 6:5). The term to “ravish the heart” means to take the heart to yourself. The term “overcome” means to capture. So we see here the beautiful truth that because her eyes and love is fixed upon the Shepherd alone and because her eye is single upon him, she has literally taken his heart captive – Oh to have such a vision of Jesus Christ.  


The Story Behind the Song 


Let’s look very briefly at the overall story. The Shulamite lived at Shumem with her widowed mother and brothers. It was in the days of her youth that she fell in love with the shepherd boy who laboured in the hills.  


Her brothers were angry with her so they sent her away to look after their vineyards. While labouring there in the hot sun with her own hands and missing her beloved, King Solomon visits his thousand vineyards in the same area. When his eyes fall upon her and he sees her beauty he immediately falls in love with her and desires to win her as his own. Today’s ecumenical movement desires to woo every pure chaste virgin church into an apostate union.  


She is brought back to Jerusalem where Solomon begins to woo her in an attempt to win her with his wealth and words. He pours out adoration and offers her everything in order to add her to his entourage of women.  


Here she is in Jerusalem. It is the most religious city in the world with the greatest heritage and reputation that can be found anywhere. The worship; the temple; the walls; the gathering of the people for the feasts; it was here that the greatest and wisest sermons could be heard from the most gifted man of the age. What else could she desire? Would this not fulfil all her dreams?  


No. She was in love with the Shepherd boy. He alone is what she desired. This song is made up of chapters filled with dreams, visitations, longings, failures, searching’s, heartache, prayers, revivals and much time as she awaits the coming of the Shepherd boy. It is her love for him that keeps her heart. None else will satisfy her. She is not looking for the confused mixture of true and false religion found at Jerusalem; she is seeking for the person of Christ Himself.  


While Solomon presses upon her an ecumenical church union, she instead is separated by her love for the Shepherd. Her love is an exclusive love.  


The Watchmen 


She speaks of the watchmen who walked around the streets and walls of Jerusalem at night. Of course these watchmen were supposed to bring safety to the inhabitants and to guard the people of God when it was dark.  


She encounters them at a time when she is desperate for her beloved, the Shepherd. Nothing in Jerusalem could satisfy; she must have his presence and person alone. “The watchmen that go about the city found me: to whom I said, Saw ye him whom my soul loveth? It was but a little that I passed from them, but I found him whom my soul loveth: I held him, and would not let him go” (Song 3:3-4). They had no answer for her; no Christ to give her; they knew not how to find him. But her hungry heart leads to him.  


Again later during a time of hesitancy on her part in seeking after Christ she goes in search of him in the streets. “The watchmen that went about the city found me, they smote me, they wounded me; (Song 5:7). These watchmen not only could not point her to Christ but abused her physically. Instead of healing her they wounded her. Many so-called watchmen and Shepherds are not only failing in the care of the Church but are hurting her terribly. They are busy bending the Bride to the culture of Solomon’s Jerusalem instead of leading her to Christ.  


She also says “the keepers of the walls took away my veil from me.” (Song 5:7). These men who were to warn of the approach of the enemy against the walls were instead caught up in removing the modest covering of the Shulamite and making her a shame and reproach to all.  


So many watchmen today have lost the ability to keep watch against the enemy and instead entertain themselves by leading the Bride into shame and exposing her beauty to the world.  


Jesus called himself the Bridegroom (Mt.9:15; 25:1; 5-6). John the Baptist said, “I am not the Christ, but that I am sent before him. He that hath the bride is the bridegroom: but the friend of the bridegroom, which standeth and heareth him, rejoiceth greatly because of the bridegroom's voice: this my joy therefore is fulfilled. (Song 3:29).  


Again the five-fold ministry must return to be “friends of the bridegroom.” They ought not to draw the Bride to themselves but aught always to point to Christ and to present her to Christ. This alone will test the worth of their ministries. Their motto must be “He must increase, but I must decrease.” (Song 3:30)  


The Daughters of Jerusalem 


One last group who appear in the story several times are the daughters of Jerusalem. They live in Jerusalem and are captivated by the glory, glamour and gild of this powerful King.  


They are a picture of virgin churches that have been seduced by Solomon and so added to his harem. They are captivated by him but having won them he now counts them as only one amongst many.  


In Revelation 17:5 we read of the MOTHER OF HARLOTS; a Mother of Harlots or one who mothers harlots. This Harlot makes harlots of virgin churches. Revelation 17 is a prophecy concerning the Roman Catholic Church in the end days before Christ’s return for His Bride. Today through ecumenical charismatic influences Rome is wholesale making harlots of most churches but one will escape this confusion, deception and apostasy; she is the true Bride of Christ.  


We have watched Rome since the glorious Revival in the days of the Reformation make harlots of the Lutheran Church, the Anglican Church, the Methodist Church and now the Pentecostal Church.  


These daughters of Jerusalem are in the most religious city on the earth – Jerusalem. In Revelation Jerusalem is spiritually called “Sodom and Egypt.” This city once noted for her great kings, revivals and prophets, although still religious, is no different from Sodom and Egypt. She is unclean inside.  


These daughters of Jerusalem cannot understand why the Shulamite thinks more of her Shepherd than of Solomon. They constantly beseech her to look at and love King Solomon but she in response charges them to ‘not stir up her love’ or ‘move her heart’ unto things or persons of this world (Song 2:7; 5:8; 8:4). Her love is singular; it is agape love.  


Their response to this is “What is thy beloved more than another beloved, O thou fairest among women? what is thy beloved more than another beloved, that thou dost so charge us? (Song 5:9). They cannot understand her love for the shepherd taking priority over this ecumenical city and its king.  


She then preaches to them concerning her Christ, “My beloved is white and ruddy, the chiefest among ten thousand.” (Song 5:10). She not only charges and challenges them but also preaches to them by overflowing with a message of utter consuming love, dedication and faithfulness.  


This is revival preaching which comes forth out of love to Christ. This sort of preaching will arise and challenge worldly compromised churches to repent and return to their first love. Thank God in this song this revived Bride reaches some of these daughters: “Whither is thy beloved gone, O thou fairest among women? whither is thy beloved turned aside? that we may seek him with thee.” (Song 6:1).    


Rev 22:17 “And the Spirit and the bride say, Come. And let him that heareth say, Come. And let him that is athirst come. And whosoever will, let him take the water of life freely.” 


Spiritual Fruit & the Shepherd’s Return 


In the midst of this song in chapter 5, Solomon, the Watchmen and the Daughters disappear from sight leaving the Shulamite alone in her garden with her beloved. 


The Shepherd is called, “Thou that dwellest in the gardens” (Song 8:13). In chapter Song 4:12, she is called “A garden inclosed.” She is like a garden where the fruit of the Spirit grows. Around the garden is a protective wall to keep out all but the Shepherd. Only He can partake of the spiritual fruit of the Bride. While the Church is on earth the one thing Christ seeks for is the fruit of the Holy Spirit (Gal.5:22-23).  


In 4:16, she prays for the Spirit of God to blow upon her in such a way as to revive her and to bring forth Christian character and virtue. “Awake, O north wind; and come, thou south; blow upon my garden, that the spices thereof may flow out. Let my beloved come into his garden, and eat his pleasant fruits.” Christ responds by saying “I am come into my garden, my sister, my spouse:” (Song 5:1) He visits her regularly to inspect her love to Him and likeness to Him.  


Lastly, all through the song she looks forward to a better day, “Until the day break, and the shadows flee away” (Song 2:17; 4:6). At present she sees “through a glass, darkly; but then face to face: now I know in part; but then shall I know even as also I am known.” (I Cor.13:12).  


At present she must persevere through trials, troubles and temptations, but then she shall possess in fullness the one she has loved.  


One day very soon there will be a sight seen by every eye and one question asked by every tongue “Who is this that cometh up from the wilderness, leaning upon her beloved?” (Song 8:5). It is the Shulamite leaning on the Shepherd.  


“And the LORD my God shall come, and all the saints with thee.” (Zech.14:5). “Behold, the Lord cometh with ten thousands of his saints,” (Jude 14). “...the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ with all his saints.” (I Thess.3:13) “Behold, he cometh with clouds; and every eye shall see him, and they also which pierced him: and all kindreds of the earth shall wail because of him. Even so, Amen.” (Rev.1:7) 


The Shulamite is a beautiful type and picture of the true Church from the day of Pentecost until the return of her beloved when she shall be caught up to be with Him in the air. 


Link: 
http://www.thenewcruse.pentecostalpioneers.org/mysteryofthechurch.html

9 comments:

  1. Thanks for posting this Sarah.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I can't tell you how encouraging this was. Praise Jesus!
    “Awake, O north wind; and come, thou south; blow upon my garden, that the spices thereof may flow out. Let my beloved come into his garden, and eat his pleasant fruits.”

    Love,
    Joshua

    ReplyDelete
  3. I am posting this comment for a reader--
    Dear Sarah,
    I really loved this post. Wow! I can't tell you how much I needed reading this. The timing was extraordinary... I tried to post a comment but blogger was having problems and I couldn't post.

    Sarah, again, thank you so much for your blogs. I'm truly blessed by them. God bless.

    If you would like here's what I wanted to post.

    Sarah,Wow! Oh Wow! PRAISE GOD. Thank you for posting this...I've read this and will read again and again. This is so important what you've posted. Food for the spirit man, the oasis in the desert. This also happens to be a great vindication of my suffering and trials (too long to explain here, but suffice to say, this is an answer to prayer) and the eventual letter and subsequent blog regarding Mark Driscoll's (pastor at mars hill church) teaching on the Peasant Princess series and how he took Jesus Christ completely out of Song of Songs stating that if this story has anything to do with Jesus then he'd never want to see Jesus in this light. He gives it a yuck factor to even think this story is about a love affair of the church and the shepherd Jesus Christ... Mark Driscoll then goes on to preach to his followers how this story is never to be taken in allegory but rather a literal story of how a love affair between a husband and wife should be and gives graphic example of he and his wife drinking wine before their passionate interludes.

    I knew the Holy Spirit prompted me to yearn after seeking Christ as passionate as the Shulamite. My dear Lord knows how important and timely your post is so perfect for the day and age we live in. Thank you sister. Thank you and God bless. Where did you get this?

    HERE'S THE BLOG I POSTED ON SONG OF SONGS and its importance to today's saints and how a false teacher, Mark Driscoll is trying to discredit it.: (by the way he has several groups including cult watch keeping an eye on him.)
    Continued below...

    ReplyDelete
  4. Among the numerous cult like control tactics he uses on intimidating his flock there's one that reveals his true nature. In his book, video (church commercialism) THE PEASANT PRINCESS... http://www.marshillchurch.org/media/the-peasant-princess. In the Peasant Princess, Driscoll gives us his view of the 'true' meaning of the song of songs. He takes a 100 % view that the book is totally literal and has ABSOLUTELY nothing to do with any sense of allegory. He even goes so far to say that "IF" this book was even remotely allegorical in nature as in telling us of Jesus, he wouldn't want to see Jesus in this sense.

    This is severe in my opinion because 1. literal completely removes JESUS CHRIST from the scripture which is based on the compassion of the true love story for JESUS. 2. It teaches and shows the Bible in this book as only a carnal love story and how we are to date our wife and the preludes to sex. Pretty passionate Driscoll gets while he is describing how a chilled bottle of red wine gets him fired up to work on his wife from passages in Song of Songs...

    But in an even deeper sense, Driscoll is undermining the process of Grace vs Works. The law of Moses vs the Faith in Christ Jesus. If righteousness comes by the law (or literal meaning of written text vs the TRUE SPIRIT POWER OF THE written scriptures as revealed by ALLEGORY) which Paul clearly explains in Galatians 2:21; 4:21-29 To counter the Judaizers and even Peter who was bewitched as well as the polluted minds of the Christians at Galatia. Throughout the Bible, literal text = the letter = the law... On the other hand, The Spiritual aspects = Grace = JESUS. The letter kills the Spirit gives life. 2 Corinthians 3:6; The words I speak to you are Spirit and they are Life. John 6:63.

    How can Song of Songs (Song of Solomon) in the old Testament be compared to Galatians and with GRACE vs WORKS? SIMPLY by the same way the Judaizers and Driscoll both work by removing JESUS from key elements in our Christian walk.

    Paul carefully explains how the story of Abraham's two sons, the one by a bond maid, the other by a free woman. (Genesis 16), is an allegory in it's deepest meaning. If we read the story in Genesis about how Abraham had two sons by two different wives we loose the deeper meaning that Paul gives us in the allegory which is JESUS CHRIST VS THE LAW OF MOSES. This becomes the basis for the core meaning of the GOSPEL = GOOD NEWS = JESUS CHRIST IS OUR SALVATION AND BY HIS BLOOD ON THE CROSS WE ARE FREE BY FAITH IN BELIEVING ON JESUS AND NOT BY OUR WORKS OR PRACTICE OF LITERAL LAW TO EARN OUR SALVATION.

    Paul takes the old testament story as an allegory depicting the New Testament doctrine of justification by faith.

    In John Bunyan's 'THE PILGRIM'S PROGRESS" the complete story is allegory for a specific purpose: To show that all of life has a purpose for the unseen, the end which is giving our lives to Christ. here are quotes from the book's introduction for the purpose of explanation: Allegory has often been described as a suitable mode to represent the alienated, objectified character of worldly experience.... Allegory's purpose is to teach us that the experimental world - the carnal or "fleshly" dimension, is fallen into disharmonious relation with it's creator: Allegory itself was sown by Christianity. Considered in allegorical terms, then the profane world is both elevated and devalued .the Christian perspective, taking appearances for reality is not only erroneous, but also sinful."
    Continued below...

    ReplyDelete
  5. In the Introduction to PILGRIMS PROGRESS, David Hawkes explains: (pagexxiii.xxiv) "To insist on a literalistic reading of the story (Genesis 16) would be, in Paul's view to remain ignorant of the difference between the law and the gospel. Paul's epistle thus establishes the connection between literalism and legalism that dominates Bunyan's aesthetic practice. The Pilgrim's Progress insists that we must view the world of the flesh as an extended allegory, and this constant referral of material signs to spiritual meanings is the journey that its hero undertakes. .. Like Paul and Bunyan, Luther spent many years in the vain attempt to achieve righteousness through obedience to the law in its civil, moral, and ceremonial guises. The Reformation began with his realization that this was impossible, and that justification before God could be attained only through faith in Christ... (THROUGH FAITH IN CHRIST.) But we imagine as it were two worlds, the one heavenly and the other earthly. In these we place these two kinds of righteousness, being separate the one far from the other. Luther's dichotomy involves the division of every aspect of experience along these lines, and the Commentary constructs a lengthy series of binary oppositions on this basis: these oppositions are so prominent throughout the *Pilgrims Progress that a visual aid may be useful as a mnemonic: JUSTICE/MERCY; LAW/GRACE; WORKS/FAITH; FLESH/SPIRIT; TYPE/ANTITYPE; LITERAL/ALLEGORICAL; OLD MAN/NEW MAN; MOSES/CHRIST; FIRST ADAM/SECOND ADAM; OLD TESTAMENT/NEW TESTAMENT; BODY/SOUL; ACTIVE RIGHTEOUSNESS/PASSIVE RIGHTEOUSNESS; EARTH/HEAVEN; ALIENATION/RECONCILIATION; DEATH/LIFE; DAMNATION/SALVATION; IMPRISONMENT; LIBERTY. end quote.

    In detail Driscoll dismantles JESUS CHRIST and replaces Christ with the Peasant Princess. The comparison is seen above in the Mnemonic used in Pilgrim's Progress. The one that hurt my heart the most is in Chapter 2 of Song of Songs: "I am the rose of Sharon and the lily of the valleys" This belongs to my Lord Jesus and not to a Peasant Girl.
    Continued below...

    ReplyDelete
  6. As Matthew Henry writes in his commentary of Song of Songs: "S of S is an allegory 3; (a device used to convey a meaning ... a representation other than literal - speaking here only by the Spirit) to read by the letter which kills those who rest in the that to look no further but the spirit of which gives lives. 2 Cor. 3:6; Jn 6:63 a parable which makes divine things more difficult to those who do not love them but more plain and to pleasant to those who do. Matthew 13;14.. Experienced Christians find here a counter part of their experiences and to them it is intelligible - while those who have no part nor lot in the matter neither understand it or relish it... When we apply ourselves to the study of this book we must not only with Moses and Joshua put off our shoe from off our feet and even forget we have bodies because he he place we stand on is holy ground but we must with John come up hither must spread our wings, take a noble flight, and soar upwards till by faith and holy love we enter into the holiest, for this is no other than the house of God and this is the gate of heaven. " end quote.

    I am the rose of Sharon, and the lily of the valleys."—Song of Solomon 2:1.

    Quote taken from Charles Spurgeon regarding Song of Solomon 2:1: "THE time of flowers has come, and as they are in some faint degree emblems of our Lord, it is well, when God thus calls, that we should seek to learn what he desires to teach us by them. If nature now spreads out her roses and her lilies, or prepares to do so, let us try, not only to see them, but to see Christ as he is shadowed forth in them.

    "I am the rose of Sharon, and the lily of the valleys." If these are the words of the Well-beloved,—and I have no doubt that they are,—then it may be suggested by some that here we have the Savior praising himself; and it is true; but in no unworthy sense, for well may he praise himself since no one else can do it as it should be done. There is no human language that can ever set forth his beauties as they deserve to be told. As good John Berridge says,—

    "Living tongues are dumb at best, We must die to speak of Christ" End Quote.

    Lord Jesus I pray for Pastor Mark Driscoll that he humble himself before you and open up his heart to preach Christ instead of the Flesh in his message. Amen.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Hi Andrew- Thank you for sending the comment. I had to post it in several parts. I hope that the blog is not having comment posting issues again. It seems to come and go. If anyone else has issues, let me know. Try clearing your cache and cookies.

    As to Mark Driscoll and the Peasant Princess-
    I watched the preview-- http://marshill.com/media/the-peasant-princess/the-peasant-princess-preview#play

    and I am really grieved at the whole thing. Mark Driscoll says that this on-going series is about the Song of Songs and he does say it is about dating, sex, romance and intimacy. ALL of which has absolutely NOTHING to do with the TRUE story that God is revealing to us in the Song of Solomon!

    I can imagine there are many men who have a hard time understanding how to translate the story of intimacy between the Shulamite woman and her Shepherd love and equate this to the kind of intimate relationship that God wants us to have with Him. But the truth is the relationship we have with Jesus IS a Love relationship because just as we would choose our mate, we must choose Him. He does not force us to do so. He did not create robots, it is OUR choice. Think about your own marriage, were you forced to love that person? NO. And this is why God uses the love relationship between a man and woman to help us understand this concept. And it is so awesomely expressed in the Song of Solomon!

    So once again, we must keep our eyes and hearts focused on Christ and His word and let God be true and every man a liar!

    In Christ, Sarah


    if you Google him there is lots on controversy around the guys beliefs. This article called "Who Would Jesus Smack Down" says; "he has the coolest style and foulest mouth of any preacher you’ve ever seen."

    http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/11/magazine/11punk-t.html?pagewanted=all

    I can hardly believe some of the titles of some of his videos on Youtube-
    "Biblical Oral Sex"
    "Jesus Is "Kinda Like" Jon Stewart and Stephen Colbert"

    ReplyDelete
  8. Yes, Sarah, absolutely. I can't express how hurt I was and seriously felt pain and deep regret when I heard Driscoll's peasant princess. I then realized this was all a part of the last days when even men standing behind the pulpit would draw many away from the truth and with great authority in their brass voice take Jesus out of the picture. Yes, I've been in touch with Cultwatch and other organizations regarding Driscoll. I'm aware of this nytimes link you sent.
    Thank you again sister.
    God bless

    ReplyDelete
  9. Thank you for posting Sarah. I was really moved and excited by this post. You know, since I was a kid Song of Songs always did something remarkable to me. I knew way before I understood the allegorical richness of S of S as I do now, and I know I still don't even understand the depths to this book, that this was a deep, rich expression of a wonderful passion for Jesus Christ. I love what you said about looking at my own marriage: how my mate was my choosing and no one forced me to love her.. I had to choose her. Other men in my wife's life who met her before I did looked at her as a common, nobody. But I look at her as the most special woman in the world. The same as with our Lord and Master and Savior Jesus Christ. The saints have a burning, passionate, indescribable love for him. We yearn for him. We can't even live or think of living a moment without him and we know him beyond the dimensions of religion.
    Sister, thank you for being a watchman and a teacher for the saints in these last days.
    God bless,

    ReplyDelete

If you would not speak these words you are about to post to the Lord Jesus Christ, then maybe you should not post them. Otherwise I appreciate your comments and fellowship on this blog. Thanks! Sarah